Does ad agency work “mimic art”?
January 2nd, 2012 at 12:57 am ETI’m reading this profile of Carrie Brownstein, one of the two people (with Fred Armisen) behind “Portlandia,” and I find this passage about Brownstein’s earlier life is needling me:
Thinking that an office job might be a good thing to try, she did a six-month stint at Weiden+Kennedy — the modish Portland ad agency responsible for Nike’s “Just Do It” campaign. (The agency’s playcentric workplace has been spoofed on “Portlandia.”) But working at an ad agency proved alienating, she said, because of the way “the work mimics art.” She added, “Music, to me, is an earnest populist endeavor and this was a cynical populist one.”
I respect Brownstein, love her work, and know what she’s getting at, of course — anyone who’s ever been asked by a client, “Can’t you just make us one of them ‘viral videos’ and be done with it?” knows the difference between genuine art (or even honest craftsmanship) and a pig with pretty lipstick on it. But I’ve spent much of the past twenty years finding a way to be professionally successful in an agency career, while still feeling that my genuine creativity is one of the things the market is rewarding. And many of the people I work with daily, at Blue State Digital and elsewhere would say the same. And that list of people includes some of those I most admire for their genuine creative energy.
On this blog you’ve seen me struggle with formal and informal creative exercises (like The Artist’s Way program). Arguably one point of this blog is to give me a creative outlet that’s “untainted” by the market, although much of what I write about is connected to my professional life; it’s hard to separate the strands. But the richest creative encounters I’ve had in my adult life have come through my work. I’ve met people who are generative, uncompromising, and blessed with the power of vision, and not just a handful, but many of them. I’ve taken lessons from each of those traits, from each of those people, and those lessons have helped me not just in my work, but in my life.
The creativity I’ve experienced in agency people isn’t second-class. It’s real. There are people in the advertising business who are “real” creatives and yet who thrive on the pragmatism of the work, the fact that it can’t all be vision but must be vision with purpose. Just as the constraints of the sonnet form liberated Shakespeare to write some of the finest poetry in English, and the laws of physics liberated Thomas Edison to envision new devices that actually worked, in the very same way the need to sell more sneakers or generate more museum memberships or influence more voters liberates these people to build castles in the air that people want to own and live in.
It’s an eternal tension in art and indeed in craft, that between faithfulness to vision and practicality of product. But it is a tension, and even in art, being able to produce something that people want to experience matters. Otherwise, what’s the point? Some artists are happy creating for themselves; others are more motivated by the sense of fulfillment they feel when the audience loves their work, embraces it, does with it what they envisioned would be done. The first type of creativity isn’t more genuine than the second. We all have all these impulses woven together into our creative selves.












Rich Mintz blogs on online fundraising and social media, American history and culture, bicycling and urbanism, food, technology, and other topics. Professionally, he's an expert in fundraising, constituency development, and social media for nonprofits, cultural organizations, cause-related marketers, and corporations. He is based in New York, where he serves as Vice President, Strategy, for 